|
The following
table provides a breakdown of entries by auto manufacturer for the above Best of
1996 and Worst of 1996 tables.
|
Percentage of Entries in the Best of 1996
Table That Were Products of
the Listed Manufacturer |
|
Percentage of Entries in the Worst of 1996
Table That Were Products of
the Listed Manufacturer |
|
Auto Manufacturer |
Percentage |
Auto Manufacturer |
Percentage |
|
Toyota |
56% |
Toyota |
0% |
|
Honda |
44% |
Honda |
0% |
|
Nissan |
0% |
Nissan |
0% |
|
Mazda |
0% |
Mazda |
0% |
|
Mitsubishi |
0% |
Mitsubishi |
2% |
|
Volvo |
0% |
Volvo |
0% |
|
Ford |
0% |
Ford |
4% |
|
Volkswagen |
0% |
Volkswagen |
6% |
|
Chrysler |
0% |
Chrysler |
42% |
|
General Motors |
0% |
General Motors |
46% |
|
Other |
0% |
Other |
0% |
|
Total |
100% |
Total |
100% |
|
In the computation of the above
percentages, a model entry for which only one year of data was
available was counted as a one-half entry. For reference, see
Methodology. |
In the computation of the above
percentages, a model entry for which only one year of data was
available was counted as a one-half entry. For reference, see
Methodology. |
A
model's Reliability Percentrank is a ranking of that model's Reliability Score
relative to all other Reliability Scores for the given model year and age range.
The percentrank was computed using the Percentrank function of Microsoft's Excel
2002 and, as the first part of the compound word percentrank suggests, is
a value between 0.00 and 1.00. If a model's Reliability Percentrank is near
0.00, it has a very low Reliability Score, and if a Percentrank is near 1.00, it
has a high Reliability Score. For a more detailed explanation of Reliability
Percentranks and Reliability Scores, click
here to be taken to the Methodology page.
The Item Numbers in the above table refer to the Item
Numbers in the main table,
Table I-MVRP: Motor Vehicle Reliability Percentranks.
To view the Best and Worst tables for other model years or
the most recent Summary of these tables, select from the following menu table.
Some Auto News Articles:
| January 2007: Toyota Expands Dominance on Durability Measure |
| September 2006: Reliability Updates: Best and Worst Cars and Trucks Tables: A Chart Summary |
| August 2006: Reliability Updates: For Vehicles 6-to-8 Years Old, Toyota Accounts for 7 of 10 Best, GM - 17 of 36 Worst |
| August 2006: Reliability Updates: For Vehicles 5-to-7 Years Old, Toyota Accounts for 9 of 13 Best, GM - 17 of 42 Worst |
| August 2006: Reliability Updates: For Model Year 2002, Toyota Accounts for 11 of 16 Best, GM - 16 of 53 Worst |
| August 2006: Fitch Cuts Ford Debt Deeper into Junk, Retains Negative Outlook, Puts Estimated Post-Bankruptcy Recovery at 51-70%; Will GM-Ford Race to Bankruptcy End in Dead Heat? |
| August 2006: For 2-to-3-Year-Old Model-Year-2003 Vehicles, Toyota Garners 8 of Top 9 and 9 of Top 14, General Motors Accounts for 18 of Bottom 46 |
| August 2006: Toyota Dominates Auto on Info's Rosters of High Mileage Vehicles; Honda Places Second: Another Auto Manufacturer Durability Award for Each |
| June 2006: S&P Cuts Ford Debt Deeper into Junk: Which of the Big Two Will Win the Race to Bankruptcy? |
| June 2006: In the U.S. in May 2006, Reliable Two and Legendary Corolla Sales Soar Past Previous Records; Big Three Sales Take a Step into Friction-Free Free Fall; Accelerated Consumer Shift to Quality and Out of GM Products Puts Prospect of Multiple Bankruptcy Filings on GM's Horizon |
| June 2006: Toyota and Honda Dominate CR's 2006 Higher-Reliability, Higher-Owner-Satisfaction Quick Picks; Big Three Score Zip |
| May 2006: Toyota and Honda Account for 75% of CR's Top Picks, Alternatives, and Runners-up; Subaru and Nissan Account for Balance; Big Three Score Zip |
| April 2006: In 2006, Toyota and Honda Rule Most Reliable List with 10 of 10 Best, GM Dominates Least Reliable List with 6 of 10 Worst: Reliability Gap Grows |
| April 2006: In the U.S. in March 2006, Consumers Continue Their March to Quality: Reliable Two Sales Set New March Records; GM Sales Plunge; Ford Sales Drop |
| March 2006: Moody's Cuts GM Creditworthiness Another Notch Deeper into Junk |
| March 2006: Consumer Shift to Quality Gives Reliable Two Nearly Half of Global Market Capitalization and Leaves GM with 2% |
| March 2006: Toyota Reliability Takes Another Leap Up; Honda's Too; Toyota-GM Reliability Gap Sets Another Record: Will GM Bottom? |
| February 2006: Toyota and Honda Cars Account for All of CR's 2006 Family Sedan All-Around Quick Picks |
| February 2006: GM Strengthens Lead in Race to Bankruptcy: Moody's Cuts GM's Credit a Notch Deeper into Junk |
| February 2006: General Motors and DaimlerChrysler Again Dominate CR's Used-Cars-to-Avoid List |
| February 2006: Into the Pits and Down and Under Charges the General; General Motors Sets Record Share of CR's Much-Worse-Than-Average |
| February 2006: In the U.S. in January 2006, Reliable Two Sales Soar to Set New January Sales Records; GM and Ford Dodge Plunge with Huge, Premature Fleet Sales, but GM's Market Share Still Drops a Notch; Toyota RAV4 Overtakes Honda CR-V with Dramatic Sales Surge |
| January 2006: U.S. President Bush Says GM and Ford Must Make a Relevant Product, But Can They and Should They Try? |
| January 2006: Toyota Overwhelmingly Dominates Another Measure of Durability |
| January 2006: By WSJ's Lot-Stay Time, Made-in-Japan TMC Models Are Top 5 of Hottest 10 |
| January 2006: Ford Cuts GM Lead in Race to Insolvency: Which Big Three Will Go Bust First? |
| December 2005: By CR's Predicted Short-Term Reliability for Model Year 2006, Toyota and Honda Dominate Best, GM and Ford Dominate Worst |
| September 2005: In the U.S. in August 2005, Reason Rather Returns: Quality Four Sales Soar, GM Sales Plunge |
| September 2005: Fifteen-Year Data History Points to Continued Overwhelming Dominance of the Best of Each Year by TMC |
| September 2005: Auto on Info Site Manager's Conclusion: GM Likely to Dominate Worst-Cars-and-Trucks Tables for Years to Come |
| August 2005: For 2-to-3-Year-Old Model Year 2002 Vehicles, Toyota Garners 6 of Top 9, General Motors - 13 of Bottom 45 |
| August 2005: For Vehicles 2-to-4 Years Old, Toyota Garners 11 of Top 16, General Motors - 16 of Bottom 40 |
| August 2005: For Vehicles 3-to-5 Years Old, Toyota Garners 9 of Top 14, Honda - 5 of Top 14, and General Motors - 19 of Bottom 44 |
| August 2005: For Vehicles 4-to-6 Years Old, Toyota Garners 6 of Top 10, General Motors Garners 15 of Bottom 38 |
| August 2005: For Vehicles 5-to-7 Years Old, Honda Garners 5 of Top 9, Toyota - 4 of Top 9, and General Motors - 19 of Bottom 38 |
| August 2005: For Vehicles 6-to-8 Years Old, Toyota Garners 7 of Top 10 Reliability Percentranks, General Motors Gathers 23 of Lowest 36 |
| August 2005: Speediest Dilapidations: General Motors Accounts for 16 of the 20 Worst |
| August 2005: By WSJ's Lot Stay Time, Toyota Has 8 of Hottest 12 |
| August 2005: Toyota Dominates Auto on Info's Rosters of High Mileage Vehicles; Honda Places Second: Another Auto Manufacturer Durability Award for Each |
| August 2005: In the U.S. in July 2005, Reliable Two and Nissan Sales Soar on Quality; Big Three Sales Soar on Discounts |
| July 2005: Toyota and BMW Among World's 20 Most Innovative Companies; Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Honda Brand Names Among World's 20 Most Valuable |
| July 2005: Mini-Survey Points to Toyota Dominance in Overall Quality and Customer Satisfaction |
| May 2005: Does 'GM' Mean 'Junk'? |
| May 2005: Toyota-Big Three Quality Gap Huge, and Growing |
| May 2005: Toyota and Honda Rule Most Reliable List with 12 of 12 Best, GM Dominates Least Reliable List with 8 of 11 Worst |
| May 2005: With U.S. Consumer Shift toward Quality Unabated, S&P Cuts GM and Ford's Debt to Junk |
| May 2005: In the U.S. in April 2005, Quality Four Sales Soar, GM and Ford Continue Free Fall |
| May 2005: Park That Ford on the Street! |
| May 2005: General Motors Vehicles Hit with Another Safety Investigation: NHTSA to Investigate 1.3 Million GM Pickup Trucks and SUVs for Corroding Brake Part |
| April 2005: King of Recalls Recalls Again: General Motors Leaps Past Ford with Recall of 2 Million Vehicles, Including 1.5 Million 2003-2005 SUVs and Pickups |
| April 2005: Consumer Shift Toward Quality Gives Honda Market Capitalization Greater Than GM's and Ford's Combined |
| April 2005: Moody's Cuts GM Long-Term Debt Rating to One Notch Above Junk, Puts Ford Debt Under Review |
| April 2005: General Motors Models Dominate Flop Survey |
| April 2005: Himmel vs. Ford Motor |
| April 2005: Part of GM's Repair Kit - A Very Bloodied Ax |
| April 2005: In the U.S. in March 2005, Toyota and Nissan Sales Advance, Ford and GM Sales Drop |
| April 2005: General Motors' Dominion - Down & Under |
| March 2005: Additional Measures of Toyota's Dominion in Automotive Quality: Market Capitalizations and Bond Ratings of Toyota vs. General Motors, Ford, DaimlerChrysler, and Volkswagen |
| March 2005: Toyota and Honda Dominate Consumer Reports 2005 Overall Quick Pick List; Big Three Score Zip |
| March 2005: Models Engineered by Toyota and Honda Dominate Consumer Reports Fuel Economy Quick Pick List; Big Three-Engineered Models Score Zip |
| March 2005: Toyota and Honda Dominate Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction Quick Pick List; Big Three Score Zip |
| March 2005: GM's Bond Rating, Bond Outlook, Common Stock, and Market Cap Take a Tumble, Reports WSJ |
| March 2005: General Motors Slashes 2005 Earnings Estimate, S&P Cuts GM's Outlook to Negative |
| March 2005: General Motors Dominates List of Models with Highest Death Rates |
| March 2005: General Motors and Chrysler Dominate Consumer Reports Used-Cars-To-Avoid List |
| March 2005: General Motors Dominates Consumer Reports Much-Worse-Than-Average Reliability List, Again |
| March 2005: Toyota and Honda Again Dominate Consumer Reports Good Bets List |
| March 2005: Toyota Dominates Consumer Reports Reliability Quick Pick List; Big Three Score Zip |
| October 2004: Is GM King of Junk? |
| October 2004: The 2004 Auto Reliability Updates: Toyota Continues to Govern; GM Stays Stuck ... Deep, Down and Under, and Below |
| September 2004: Toyota and Honda Dominate Consumer Reports' Best in Class by Cargo Space and Fuel Economy |
| September 2004: In the U.S. in August 2004, Sales at Both Ends of the Quality Spectrum Are Mixed, Ford's Market Share Remains at .18, and Once Again Toyota Displaces Chrysler as Number 3 |
| August 2004: General Motors Safety Recalls Keep Rolling On |
| August 2004: Toyota Has Four of July 2004's Hottest Selling Top Ten; Honda, BMW, and DaimlerChrysler - Each Two |
| July 2004: Toyota and Honda Dominate June 2004's Hottest Selling Top Ten |
| May 2004: General Motors Quality Drops Again |
| May 2004: Toyota's Reliability Continues to Advance: Gap with Big Three Grows |
| April 2004: General Motors 2004 Recalls Continue to Mount: Is GM Quality Dropping Like a Rock? |
| March 2004: Prompted by a Growing Number of Injuries and an Intensified U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Investigation, General Motors Recalls 4 Million Pickups |
| March 2004: Toyota Dominates List of Best Cars and Trucks; General Motors Dominates List of Worst Cars and Trucks |
| March 2004: General Motors' U.S. 2003 Recall Numbers: A Bottomless Pit and a GM Defense? |
| February 2004: GM's Quality Problems Keep Rolling Out: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ratchets Up Investigation into General Motors' Collapsing Tailgates |
| January 2004: The Piston Slap - Engine Knock Lawsuits: Do General Motors' Pickup Trucks and SUVs Make a Grotesque Noise? |
The visitor may find the following tables and charts useful as well.
|
Cumulative Number of Auto on Info
Auto Manufacturer Awards for Motor
Vehicle Quality |
|
Cumulative Number of First Place Positions in Auto on Info's
Auto
Manufacturer Awards for Motor Vehicle Quality |
|
Auto Manufacturer |
Awards |
Auto Manufacturer |
First Place Positions |
|
Toyota |
34 |
Toyota |
34 |
|
Honda |
26 |
Honda |
1 |
|
Mercedes-Benz |
2 |
Mercedes-Benz |
0 |
|
Nissan |
4 |
Nissan |
0 |
|
BMW |
1 |
BMW |
0 |
|
Volvo |
1 |
Volvo |
0 |
|
General Motors |
0 |
General Motors |
0 |
|
Ford |
0 |
Ford |
0 |
|
Chrysler |
0 |
Chrysler |
0 |
|
This table is current as of 31
August 2006. |
This table is current as of 31
August 2006. |
|
Shares of Consumer Reports' 2005 Quick Picks, by Auto
Manufacturer and Motor Vehicle Line |
|
Manufacturer |
Share of
2005 Reliability Quick Picks |
Share of
2005 Owner Satisfaction Quick Picks |
Share of
2005 Fuel Economy Quick Picks |
Share of
2005 Overall Quick Picks |
|
|
Vehicle Line |
|
Toyota |
.63 |
.47 |
.46 |
.33 |
|
|
Lexus |
.11 |
.16 |
0.00 |
.14 |
|
|
Toyota |
.53 |
.32 |
.46 |
.19 |
|
Honda |
.21 |
.26 |
.38 |
.33 |
|
|
Acura |
.11 |
.11 |
.08 |
.05 |
|
|
Honda |
.11 |
.16 |
.31 |
.29 |
|
Subaru |
.05 |
.11 |
0.00 |
.14 |
|
Nissan |
0.00 |
.05 |
0.00 |
.14 |
|
|
Infiniti |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
.05 |
|
|
Nissan |
0.00 |
.05 |
0.00 |
.10 |
|
Mazda |
.05 |
.05 |
.15 |
.051 |
|
BMW |
0.00 |
.05 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Mitsubishi |
.05 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Ford, Chrysler,
General Motors, and all others |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
1
Mazda's one entry,
the Mazda3 i, may have been pulled from Consumer Reports'
Overall Quick Pick List due to a
"Poor"
side-impact crash test rating by the Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety. The Insurance Institute's rating did cause
Consumer Reports to pull the Mazda3 from its recommended
list. |
|
All shares are rounded to two
significant digits. |
|
CR 2005 Quick Picks are quick pick
models of model year 2005. |
|
Note: A rebadge of a product
engineered by Toyota, but sold by another auto manufacturer, is
omitted from the latter's share. |
|
Source for Consumer Reports' Good
Bets: "Quick Picks," Consumer Reports, April
2005, P. 31 |
|
Shares of Consumer Reports' 2006 Good Bets for Model Years
1998-2005 with Selected 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank Averages,
by Auto Manufacturer and Motor Vehicle Line |
|
Manufacturer |
Share of CR 2006 Good Bets
with a 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank Average1 Greater
Than or Equal to .80 |
Share of CR 2006 Good Bets
with a 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank Average1 Greater
Than or Equal to .85 |
Share of CR 2006 Good Bets
with a 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank Average1 Greater
Than or Equal to .90 |
Share of CR 2006 Good Bets
with a 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank Average1 Greater
Than or Equal to .95 |
|
|
Vehicle Line |
|
Toyota |
.48 |
.52 |
.57 |
.83 |
|
|
Lexus |
.13 |
.16 |
.22 |
.33 |
|
|
Toyota |
.35 |
.35 |
.35 |
.50 |
|
Honda |
.28 |
.29 |
.26 |
.17 |
|
|
Acura |
.10 |
.13 |
.09 |
0.00 |
|
|
Honda |
.18 |
.16 |
.17 |
.17 |
|
Subaru |
.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Nissan |
.12 |
.16 |
.13 |
0.00 |
|
|
Infiniti |
.07 |
.10 |
.13 |
0.00 |
|
|
Nissan |
.05 |
.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Mazda |
.02 |
.03 |
.04 |
0.00 |
|
Ford, Chrysler,
General Motors, and all others |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
1
If the vehicle model is too new for a 1997-2001 Reliability Percentrank average to exist, the early 2002 Reliability Percentrank
is used when such exists. |
|
All shares are rounded to two
significant digits. |
|
CR Good Bets are models that have three or more
model years between 1998 and 2005 of better-than-average reliability
and have performed well on Consumer Reports' road tests. An auto
Reliability Percentrank is
a measure of relative overall reliability used by Auto on Info. |
|
Note: Two rebadges of products
engineered by Toyota, but sold by another auto manufacturer, are
omitted from the latter's share. |
|
Source for Consumer Reports' Good
Bets: "CR Good Bet: The Best of Both World's,"
Consumer Reports Cars: Used
Car Buying Guide 2006, p.
25 |
|
Source for Reliability
Percentrank averages:
Table I-MVRP |



|
Median Reported
Severity of Engine Knock for Various Classes of GM Vehicles as
of July 12, 2005 |
|
Class |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
GM pickup trucks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
GM sport utility vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
GM minivans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
GM passenger cars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
Value definitions: 0 is not
auditorily offensive; 2 is auditorily offensive; 6 is very
auditorily offensive; 8 is extremely auditorily offensive. |
|
To view more results or to express your opinion regarding the engine knock in General Motors
Corporation's products, go to Mini-Survey No. 65, GM's Piston Slap - Engine Knock." |

 |
|
*Chrysler Group Cumulative Total may include Mercedes-Benz 2004
recalls; the article on the 2004 totals was unclear on this
matter. |
|


|
Table I: Number and Percentage
of Entries in CR's 2006 Much-Worse-Than-Average List, by Manufacturer |
|
Auto Manufacturer |
Number of Entries |
Percent of Entires |
|
General Motors Corporation |
17 |
50.0% |
|
Ford Motor Company |
6* |
17.6% |
|
DaimlerChrysler AG |
4** |
11.8% |
|
Volkswagen AG |
4 |
11.8% |
|
BMW AG |
2 |
5.9% |
|
Kia Motors
Corporation |
1 |
2.9% |
|
All Others |
0 |
0% |
|
*
Two are from Ford's North American group, two are from the
Jaguar division, one is from the Land Rover division, and one is
from the Volvo division. |
|
**
Two are from DaimlerChrysler's North American Chrysler group and
two are from the Mercedes-Benz division. |
|
Source: "CR Bad Bets: Be
Especially Careful," Consumer Reports Cars: Used Car Buying Guide
2006,
p. 26 |



|
Median Value of a New Big Three
Vehicle as Assessed by Mini-Survey Respondents Reporting
Ownership of a Quality Four Product on or before July 8, 2005,
by Manufacturer |
|
Manufacturer |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at More Than
What Is Currently Asked |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at What Is
Currently Asked |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 95%
of What Is Currently Asked |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 80%
of What Is Currently Asked |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 50%
of What Is Currently Asked |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing
Plus Respondent Would Require $20,000+ per Year to Drive It |
Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing
Plus Respondent Would Require $200,000+ per Year to Drive It |
Respondent Unwilling to Own a Big
Three Vehicle under Any Circumstance |
|
Toyota Motor Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
Honda Motor Company |
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
Subaru Division of Fuji Heavy
Industries, Ltd.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
Nissan Motor Company1 |
|
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Very few respondents reported owning a product by Nissan or
Subaru. |
|
The Big Three manufacturers are
General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and the Chrysler
Group of DaimlerChrysler AG. See
Glossary. |
|
To view more results or to express
your assessment of the value of a new Big Three Vehicle, go to
Mini-Survey No. 31, "The True Value of a Big Three." |




|
Table IX |
|
S&P, Fitch,
and Moody's Senior Unsecured Long-Term Debt Ratings
as of August 18, 2006 |
|
|
Ratings |
Automobile Manufacturers |
|
S&P, Fitch Denominations |
Moody's Denominations |
|
Investment Grade Ratings |
|
|
AAA |
|
Toyota Motor Corporation |
|
AA+ |
|
|
|
AA |
|
|
|
AA- |
|
|
|
A+ |
|
Honda Motor Company |
|
A |
|
|
|
A- |
|
|
|
BBB+ |
Baa1 |
|
|
BBB |
Baa2 |
DaimlerChrysler AG |
|
BBB- |
Baa3 |
|
|
Junk Grade
Ratings |
|
|
BB+ |
Ba1 |
|
|
BB |
Ba2 |
|
|
BB- |
Ba3 |
|
|
B+ |
B1 |
Ford
Motor Company, Ford Motor Company |
|
B |
B2 |
Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation |
|
B- |
B3 |
General Motors Corporation |
|
CCC+ |
Caa1 |
General Motors Corporation |
|
CCC |
Caa2 |
|
|
CCC- |
Caa3 |
Delphi Corporation
(GM's jettisoned aggregation
of parts plants is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.) |
|
D |
|
|
Moody's Ratings of General Motors Corporation's Unsecured Long-Term Debt
by Month from January 2005 to June 2006 |
|
Investment Grade Ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |